📊 Full opportunity report: How AI Might Have Uncovered The Coldcard Security Issue on ThorstenMeyerAI.com — validation score, market gap, and execution plan.
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
TL;DR
A hardware security flaw in Coldcard wallets was exploited to drain over 1,800 BTC. While AI’s role is debated, experts agree the vulnerability was computationally accessible without advanced models. The incident highlights limits of AI in security testing.
Confirmed evidence shows that a flaw in Coldcard hardware wallets’ entropy generation was exploited to drain over 1,800 BTC. While some claims suggest AI models played a role in discovering the vulnerability, no definitive proof has emerged. This incident underscores the potential for computational tools to facilitate security breaches in offline hardware wallets.
On 30 July 2023, attackers drained approximately 1,816 BTC from Coldcard wallets without directly hacking the devices. The breach was traced to a firmware bug introduced in March 2021, which caused the device to generate seeds with significantly reduced entropy—dropping from 128 bits to about 40 bits. This reduction made the seed space small enough for automated, large-scale brute-force attacks.
The vulnerability was discovered due to a technical analysis by Block, a security firm associated with Jack Dorsey’s payments company. They found that the compromised firmware caused Coldcard devices to fall back on predictable seed generation, enabling attackers to regenerate private keys on external hardware or software, leading to the theft. The attack pattern involved automated, precomputed key scans across many addresses, rather than direct device compromise.
Claims circulated that an AI model, Kimi K3, might have been used to identify the flaw. The model’s weights reportedly landed on July 27, and the first known exploit appeared around July 29–30. However, experts note that the vulnerability is computationally straightforward, and AI was likely not necessary for its discovery. Independent researchers confirmed that AI could reproduce the vulnerability after it was publicly known, but this does not prove the model found the flaw unprompted.
Offline hardware wallets were emptied without an attacker touching a single device. The keys weren’t stolen — they were regenerated, because a firmware flaw had quietly shrunk the space of possible keys to something a machine could search.
▲ AI attribution unproven · Kimi K3 claim is a community theoryA hardware wallet’s security rests entirely on one moment: the randomness used to generate its recovery seed. A 2021 firmware change quietly broke that randomness on affected Coldcard Mk3 devices.
The signature — hundreds of unrelated wallets emptied against a prepared list — points to an automated operation working from precomputed keys, per Galaxy Research on-chain analysis.
A viral post framed this as “the AI reckoning” and named Moonshot’s new open-weight model. The timing is suggestive. The evidence is not conclusive.
- K3 weights dropped 27 Jul; first draining ~29–30 Jul — two days apart
- Public firmware is exactly what an AI code agent can read
- Widely shared, emotionally resonant, and entirely uncorroborated
- UK–US AISI eval: K3’s exploit ability reaches only ~40% of frontier US models
- Independent researchers reproduced it after the flaw was public — not cold
- A 40-bit search needs no LLM; specialised hardware brute-forces it
Strip out the attribution entirely and the important finding survives.
The real shift isn’t that AI broke cryptography — the mathematics held; the software around it did not. It’s that frontier models are collapsing the window between when a vulnerability is created, discovered, and exploited. A flaw sat dormant for four years. That dormancy is becoming the exception.
and the window from dormant bug to drained wallet just got much shorter for everyone shipping code.
Implications of AI in Hardware Security Breaches
This incident highlights the evolving landscape of hardware security and the role of AI tools in vulnerability discovery. While AI can assist in code analysis, the core flaw was a predictable entropy reduction that could be brute-forced without advanced models. The event raises questions about the limits of AI in security testing and the importance of rigorous firmware review processes.
Moreover, the fact that Coinkite conducted an AI review of its firmware weeks before the attack, which failed to detect the bug, underscores that current AI tools are not infallible. This emphasizes the need for comprehensive security audits beyond automated scans, especially for critical hardware components used in safeguarding digital assets.
hardware wallet with secure entropy generation
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background on Coldcard and the Vulnerability
Coldcard, developed by Canadian firm Coinkite, is a widely used hardware wallet designed for offline Bitcoin storage. Its security relies heavily on generating unpredictable, high-entropy seeds during initialization. In March 2021, a firmware update introduced a bug that caused the device to generate seeds using less secure, predictable data, significantly reducing entropy from 128 bits to roughly 40 bits.
This flaw remained unnoticed until attackers exploited it in July 2023, enabling large-scale automated attacks. The breach is notable because the devices themselves were never touched online; instead, the attacker used the predictable seed generation to regenerate keys and drain wallets en masse. Prior to the attack, Coinkite had performed an AI review of the firmware, which did not identify the bug.
"We conducted an AI review of our firmware weeks before the attack but did not find this issue. Our focus remains on improving security processes."
— Coinkite spokesperson
Bitcoin hardware wallet cold storage
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Unclear Role of AI in the Vulnerability Discovery
There is no concrete evidence linking AI models directly to the discovery of the seed generation flaw. While claims suggest that models like Kimi K3 may have been used, experts point out the vulnerability was a straightforward computational problem that did not require advanced AI capabilities. The extent to which AI facilitated the attack remains speculative.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Next Steps in Coldcard Security and Industry Response
Coinkite is expected to review and update its firmware security protocols, possibly incorporating more rigorous testing methods. Industry-wide, there may be increased scrutiny of AI tools used for security audits and firmware analysis. Researchers will continue exploring the limits of AI in vulnerability detection, and users are advised to update firmware and follow best security practices.
hardware wallet security accessories
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Could AI have automatically found the Coldcard vulnerability?
While AI can assist in analyzing code, the core flaw was a predictable entropy reduction that could be brute-forced without advanced models. There is no conclusive evidence that AI models like Kimi K3 discovered the flaw independently.
Why did the firmware bug go unnoticed for so long?
The bug was subtle and related to the device's seed generation process, which appeared normal during routine checks. It was only identified through detailed technical analysis after the breach occurred.
What does this mean for hardware wallet security?
This incident underscores the importance of rigorous firmware review and testing, as well as understanding the limits of automated tools like AI in security assessments.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
