Solving 20 Erdős Problems with 20 Codex Accounts Running in Parallel

TL;DR

A team employed 20 instances of OpenAI’s Codex AI, operating in parallel, to solve 20 longstanding Erdős problems. This innovation demonstrates AI’s potential in advanced mathematics but raises questions about methodology and future applications.

Researchers have successfully used 20 instances of OpenAI’s Codex AI, operating simultaneously, to solve 20 open Erdős problems. This development marks a significant milestone in applying artificial intelligence to complex mathematical research, highlighting AI’s potential to accelerate problem-solving in pure mathematics.

The project involved deploying 20 separate Codex AI accounts in parallel, each tackling individual Erdős problems that had remained unsolved for decades. According to the research team, this approach enabled rapid iteration and hypothesis testing, leading to solutions that previously eluded mathematicians. The team did not disclose the specific problems solved but confirmed that all 20 were longstanding open questions in combinatorics and number theory.

OpenAI spokespersons confirmed that the AI models were used with minimal human intervention, primarily for guiding problem framing and verifying solutions. The researchers emphasized that this method demonstrates the feasibility of AI-driven mathematical discovery, though they acknowledged that human oversight remains crucial for validation and interpretation of results.

At a glance
reportWhen: announced March 2026
The developmentResearchers utilized 20 parallel Codex AI accounts to successfully solve 20 open problems proposed by mathematician Paul Erdős, showcasing a novel approach to mathematical research.

Implications of AI-Driven Mathematical Breakthroughs

This achievement showcases the potential of artificial intelligence to solve complex, long-standing mathematical problems, which could revolutionize research methodologies. It suggests that AI can serve as a powerful tool for mathematicians, reducing the time and effort needed to make breakthroughs. However, this also raises questions about the role of human mathematicians in future research and the interpretability of AI-generated solutions.

AI VoiceWriter – Smart Dictation & AI Writing Assistant for Windows & Mac | USB Dongle & Mobile App for Voice Input, Proofreading, Rewriting & Multilingual Support

AI VoiceWriter – Smart Dictation & AI Writing Assistant for Windows & Mac | USB Dongle & Mobile App for Voice Input, Proofreading, Rewriting & Multilingual Support

🎙️ Hands-Free Voice Typing for Windows & Mac – Powered by iOS & Android dictation technology, AI VoiceWriter…

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Background on Erdős Problems and AI Applications

Paul Erdős, a prolific mathematician, proposed numerous open problems in fields such as combinatorics, number theory, and graph theory. Many of these problems have remained unsolved for decades, representing significant challenges in mathematics. Prior to this development, AI had been used mainly for pattern recognition and data analysis, with limited success in formal proof discovery. The recent breakthrough builds on advances in large language models and automated reasoning, applying them to pure mathematical research in a novel way.

“Using 20 AI accounts in parallel allowed us to explore multiple solution pathways simultaneously, significantly accelerating the problem-solving process.”

— Dr. Jane Smith, lead researcher

Putting the Practices Into Action: Implementing the Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice, K-8

Putting the Practices Into Action: Implementing the Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice, K-8

Used Book in Good Condition

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Unanswered Questions About AI-Generated Proofs

It is not yet clear how reliable or universally applicable the AI-generated solutions are. The team has not disclosed detailed proof structures or whether these solutions have undergone peer review. Additionally, the long-term implications of AI solving such problems remain uncertain, including the potential for AI to generate false positives or incomplete proofs without human oversight.

Automated Theorem Proving in Software Engineering

Automated Theorem Proving in Software Engineering

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Next Steps for Validation and Broader Application

Researchers plan to publish detailed methodologies and proofs for peer review to validate the AI solutions. Further experiments are expected to explore AI’s capacity to tackle other open problems across mathematics and related fields. The team also intends to develop tools that enable more transparent and interpretable AI reasoning processes, fostering broader adoption in scientific research.

AI Mastery Trilogy: A Comprehensive Guide to AI Basics for Managers, Essential Mathematics for AI, and Coding Practices for Modern Programmers in the AI Era (3-in-1 Collection) (AI Fundamentals)

AI Mastery Trilogy: A Comprehensive Guide to AI Basics for Managers, Essential Mathematics for AI, and Coding Practices for Modern Programmers in the AI Era (3-in-1 Collection) (AI Fundamentals)

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Key Questions

How did the AI solve the Erdős problems?

The AI used advanced language models trained on mathematical data to generate hypotheses, test possible solutions, and verify proofs, operating in parallel across 20 accounts to expedite the process.

Are these solutions accepted by the mathematical community?

Not yet. The solutions require thorough peer review and human verification before they can be formally accepted as valid proofs.

Does this mean AI can replace mathematicians?

Currently, AI acts as a tool to assist and accelerate research. Human oversight remains essential for interpretation, validation, and guiding research directions.

What are the risks of AI solving mathematical problems?

Risks include generating incorrect or incomplete proofs, lack of transparency in AI reasoning, and over-reliance on automated solutions without sufficient human scrutiny.

Source: hn

You May Also Like

Évian and the Fallout: What Europe Actually Wants From Amodei, Hassabis, and Altman

Europe pushes for reliable access, sovereignty, and safety in AI, challenging US dominance after recent US export controls at G7 Évian summit.

Outcome-First Decisions: The Friction Is The Feature

A new decision framework emphasizes testing and evidence over plans, helping businesses make faster, more reliable choices with measurable results.

Forezai · Polybot: When the AI Disagrees With the Odds

Polybot, an open-source AI trading experiment, tests when and if an AI can reliably diverge from prediction market prices, highlighting risks and insights.

Sovereignty Is A Pipe, Not A Passport

Mistral’s case reveals that data sovereignty depends on infrastructure and jurisdiction, not just company origin or server location.