🔍 Read the full analysis: DeepSeek’s Reported Funding: $16 Billion, Partly From State Players on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
TL;DR
Several news outlets report that DeepSeek has closed a second funding round worth about 100 billion yuan, or roughly $15 billion, while The Information puts the amount at 106 billion yuan and reports state-backed institutions participated. DeepSeek has not publicly confirmed the round, its investors or its terms, and reports differ on who led it.
DeepSeek reportedly closed a second funding round of about 100 billion yuan—roughly $15 billion—with The Information reporting on October 30 that state-backed institutions were among the investors. Bloomberg, Reuters and The Wall Street Journal had reported a round of about that size the previous week, but DeepSeek has not publicly confirmed the fundraising, its backers or its terms.
The reported amount is not settled. Bloomberg, Reuters and The Wall Street Journal put the round at around 100 billion yuan, or about $15 billion. The Information reported 106 billion yuan, equivalent to roughly $15.9 billion, and said the round had closed. These figures describe media reports, not an amount verified by DeepSeek.
Several outlets place DeepSeek’s pre-money valuation at about 500 billion yuan. Reports also name battery maker CATL and Tencent among the largest investors. Reuters listed other participants, including Midea, Meituan, Geely, chipmaker GigaDevice, existing shareholders NetEase and IDG Capital, and investment firms Boyu Capital, CPE and Legend Capital. The reports describe more than 15 investors, but do not provide a single agreed list.
The Information’s account adds that some of the investors were state-backed institutions. The source article says newsletter summaries of the paywalled report described China’s state chip fund, often called the “Big Fund,” as leading the round and state capital as holding a 27% share. It also says that claim could not be independently verified and that no second outlet reported it. The reported lead investor and the alleged state-capital share therefore remain unconfirmed.
Infographic 01 · Two rounds in six months
From self-funded to $74 billion.
DeepSeek took no outside money until 2026. Then came two rounds, a paused deal and a U.S. order, all in six months.
How the price moved
Reported valuations, U.S. dollars
The striped bar is my calculation (about 600 billion yuan), not a reported figure. Exchange rates vary between outlets.
Who owned DeepSeek after round 1
Share of registered capital, July 2026, as reported by Caixin
Registered capital is not the same as economic value. The October round is not yet in any reported filing.
- 22 Apr 2026Tencent and Alibaba in talks, valuation above $20 billionThe Information · first round, talks only
- 16 Jun 2026Round 1 closes: more than 50bn yuan ($7.4bn), “unusual deal structure”The Information · Liang 20bn, Tencent ~10bn, CATL 5bn yuan (Reuters, Caixin)
- 25 Jul 2026Round 2 paused after a purported investor transcript went viralBloomberg
- 6 Oct 2026Round may double to 100bn yuan; state-backed funds and companies “jostling”CNBC
- 20 Oct 2026U.S. order: DeepSeek products out of federal civilian ITDHS, Federal Register 2026-21447
- 22 Oct 2026About 100bn yuan raised · Reuters: “wrapping up”, “not ironclad”Bloomberg, Reuters, WSJ
- 23 Oct 2026Closed at 106bn yuan ($15.9bn), three people sayThe Information
- 30 Oct 2026Investor details: tech titans and “state-backed institutions”The Information
Sources: The Information, 22 Apr 2026; The Information, 16 Jun 2026; The Information, 23 Oct 2026; The Information, 30 Oct 2026; Reuters, 22 Oct 2026; Bloomberg, 22 Oct 2026; WSJ, 22 Oct 2026; CNBC, 6 Oct 2026; Caixin, 17 Jul 2026; DHS order, Federal Register, 20 Oct 2026. Arithmetic marked as mine.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
What State Participation Could Mean
If confirmed, the reported involvement of state-backed institutions would broaden questions about who finances DeepSeek and how its rapid expansion is supported. The company became known for developing AI models while relying on its owner, hedge fund High-Flyer, rather than an earlier outside funding round. A large raise involving public-linked capital would mark a change in the reported investor picture, though it would not by itself establish government control of the company or its technology.
The size of the reported round also points to a major financing effort in China’s AI sector. A roughly $15 billion raise at a reported pre-money valuation near 500 billion yuan could provide substantial resources for DeepSeek’s operations and model development. But the round’s exact size, investor shares and use of funds have not been disclosed by the company, so the practical effect cannot yet be measured.
For businesses and public agencies, funding news does not change the distinction between open model weights and DeepSeek’s hosted services. The source article says the weights remain under the permissive MIT licence and can be run on an organization’s own servers, while DeepSeek’s app and API store data in China. It also reports that a U.S. Department of Homeland Security order dated October 20 directs federal civilian agencies to remove DeepSeek products from their systems. These are separate product and policy considerations, not consequences established by the funding reports.
Popular right now
De'Longhi 15-Bar Pump Espresso Machine with Milk Frother & Temperature Control
Dyson Car+Boat Cordless Handheld Vacuum
Ninja Flip Toaster Oven and Air Fryer, 8-in-1, Stainless Steel, SP151
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From High-Flyer Funding to Outside Rounds
DeepSeek is based in Hangzhou and was founded by Liang Wenfeng. The source material describes the company as owned by High-Flyer, the Chinese hedge fund that had paid its bills before the reported outside fundraising. Its account traces a series of reports about two funding rounds over six months, which helps explain why investor lists and figures can be confused.
In April, The Information reported that Tencent and Alibaba were in talks to invest at a valuation above $20 billion. That report preceded DeepSeek’s first outside round; it is not evidence that Alibaba invested in either round. In June, The Information reported that the first round had raised more than 50 billion yuan at a valuation above $50 billion. A July account by Caixin, based on a stock-exchange filing by a small listed investor, put DeepSeek’s post-money valuation above 350 billion yuan, or about $52 billion.
Registry information reported by Caixin after the June round showed the National AI Industry Investment Fund as a direct shareholder with about 0.28%, according to the source article. It says the fund is co-controlled by the state chip fund. The same article reports that Liang held about 91% of registered capital on the last reported register, directly or through a partnership he controls. No registry change showing ownership after the reported October round was cited.
Investor Stakes Still Unverified
DeepSeek has not publicly confirmed that the round closed. The reported amount ranges from 100 billion to 106 billion yuan, and accounts differ over the lead investors and how much state-backed capital is involved. The claim that the Big Fund led with 27% state capital is especially tentative in the source material: it is attributed to summaries of The Information’s report, could not be independently verified by that source, and was not reported by another outlet.
The company’s final investor list, each participant’s stake and the round’s definitive valuation remain unavailable in the cited accounts. It is also unclear whether updated company-registry records will show changes to Liang’s reported ownership or the state-linked fund’s share. The reported $1 billion annualized revenue figure is based on Liang’s reported remarks to investors and has not been presented as an audited financial measure.
Watch for Company and Registry Disclosures
The next useful confirmation would be a statement from DeepSeek or updated corporate filings that establish whether the round closed, its final amount and the investors’ stakes. Until such information appears, the reported totals and claims about state participation should be treated as media accounts rather than company-confirmed terms.
For organizations using DeepSeek, the funding report alone does not change the service’s data practices, the MIT licence described for its model weights, or the reported U.S. federal removal order. Companies should distinguish between running weights on their own infrastructure and using the company’s app or API, while federal civilian agencies follow the applicable removal direction. No immediate change to the app or service was reported in the source material.
Key Questions
Has DeepSeek confirmed the reported funding round?
No public confirmation is cited in the source material. The round has been reported by several outlets, with The Information saying it closed.
How much did DeepSeek reportedly raise?
Bloomberg, Reuters and The Wall Street Journal reported about 100 billion yuan, or roughly $15 billion. The Information reported 106 billion yuan, around $15.9 billion. The final figure remains unconfirmed.
Are state-backed investors confirmed as the lead?
No. The Information reported participation by state-backed institutions. A claim that the state chip fund led with 27% state capital appears in summaries of its paywalled report, but the source article says it could not verify the claim and no second outlet reported it.
Did Alibaba invest in the reported rounds?
The source material says Alibaba does not appear in the reported investor lists for either round. An April report about talks with Tencent and Alibaba predates the first round and does not establish that Alibaba invested.
Does the funding report change how DeepSeek products handle data?
No such change is reported. The source article says DeepSeek’s app and API store data in China, while model weights can be run on a user’s own servers under the MIT licence. The funding news does not alter those reported distinctions.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
